5 Key Insights for Better Decision Making from Nuala Walsh

Notes from my recent Talking Billions interview

In a world overloaded with information and constant distractions, making good decisions has become increasingly difficult. Nuala Walsh, behavioral science expert and author of "Tune In, How to Make Smarter Decisions in a Noisy World," brings 30 years of investment experience and academic expertise to address this challenge.

In a recent interview, Walsh shared powerful insights on why we make poor decisions and how we can improve our decision-making process. Here are five key takeaways from that conversation:

1. Decision Risk Is the Greatest Risk We Face

While many professionals focus on commercial, economic, political, or climate risks, Walsh argues that the most fundamental risk is decision risk itself - our failure to properly hear and process information that matters.

"After about 30 years in investment management and investment banking, I came to the realization that the biggest risk isn't necessarily what we think in business," Walsh explains. "I think it actually just boils down pure and simple to decision risk and the failure to hear who and what truly matters."

Walsh observed throughout her career how even brilliant people shortchanged their careers by trusting the wrong voices and misjudging situations. These patterns led her to develop frameworks to improve decision-making.

2. Four Factors Shape Our Judgment in Today's World

Walsh identifies four critical factors that make good judgment more difficult in modern environments:

High-speed: "We live in a fast world. Everything we do is fast. Fast decisions are rewarded. And that's a problem when you're trying to optimize judgment."

Data-led: "Excessive data is overwhelming. Overload is the new normal. We're interrupted so often that nearly 70% of employees don't have enough uninterrupted time to do their job."

Visual: "What we see dominates and skews our interpretation. We see what we want to see and don't necessarily consider what we hear."

Polarized: "We think in binary ways - is something black or white, good or bad, right or wrong? When we think in this binary way, it reduces our spectrum."

The combination of these factors stacks the odds against good judgment, making conscious effort necessary to overcome them.

3. Beyond Blind Spots: Recognize Deaf Spots and Dumb Spots

While most people are familiar with blind spots, Walsh introduces two additional concepts crucial for better decision-making:

"A blind spot is immunity to see a problem, a deaf spot is the inability to hear accurately, and a dumb spot is the inability to either speak wisely or articulate what you hear," Walsh clarifies.

Deaf spots include phenomena like "deaf ear syndrome" - hearing only what you want to hear, or "wishful hearing" - interpreting signals in ways that align with what you hope to be true. These psychological tendencies explain why warning signs are often missed before crises occur.

4. The PERIMETER Framework Helps Identify Decision Traps

Walsh developed the PERIMETER framework to categorize ten judgment traps that frequently bias decision-making:

• Power-based traps (following authority without questioning)

• Ego-based traps (refusing to consider alternative viewpoints)

• Risk-based traps (sensation-seeking or uncertainty avoidance)

• Identity-based traps (decisions driven by self-image or group membership)

• Memory traps (overreliance on recalled events that may be inaccurate)

• Ethics traps (compromised ability to do the right thing)

• Time-based traps (overweighting past, present, or future)

• Emotion-based traps (inability to regulate impulses)

• Relationship traps (following crowds or delegating decisions)

• Story-based traps (readily accepting narratives without verification)

"The framework, the idea of the PERIMETER misjudgment traps, is that every time you make a decision, whatever the decision is, but usually high consequence, you are vulnerable to one of these particular traps," Walsh explains. Companies and leaders are now using this framework to identify and avoid these pitfalls.

5. Success Comes from Slowing Down and Creating Decision Friction

In our accelerated world, Walsh emphasizes that better decisions require deliberately slowing down, especially for high-consequence choices.

"I introduced the concept of decision friction, which is basically deliberately interrupting your own thoughts before you form a judgment," she says. This approach serves as "a speed bump for the mind" - simple techniques to pause automatic thinking and reconsider assumptions.

Walsh recommends 18 different strategies in her book that create this beneficial friction. The key is not applying these techniques to every small decision but focusing on those with significant consequences.

"You don't need to do it when you're in the supermarket, but you do need to do it when you're making decisions that affect other people's lives, whether it's your clients or your family," Walsh advises.

By creating these deliberate pauses and questioning our own thinking, we can overcome the biases that lead to poor decisions and tune in to what truly matters in our noisy world.

Podcast Program – Disclosure Statement

Blue Infinitas Capital, LLC is a registered investment adviser and the opinions expressed by the Firm’s employees and podcast guests on this show are their own and do not reflect the opinions of Blue Infinitas Capital, LLC. All statements and opinions expressed are based upon information considered reliable although it should not be relied upon as such. Any statements or opinions are subject to change without notice.

Information presented is for educational purposes only and does not intend to make an offer or solicitation for the sale or purchase of any specific securities, investments, or investment strategies. Investments involve risk and unless otherwise stated, are not guaranteed.

Information expressed does not take into account your specific situation or objectives, and is not intended as recommendations appropriate for any individual. Listeners are encouraged to seek advice from a qualified tax, legal, or investment adviser to determine whether any information presented may be suitable for their specific situation. Past performance is not indicative of future performance.